U.S. Chess Mates - Article # 7
U.S. Chess Mates
Professional Chess Instruction for Children of all Ages.
Top 10 Myths About Chess
By: Mark Weeks
People, especially chess players themselves, say the darnedest things
about chess and about chess players. Here are some of our favorite myths
about the royal game. Some of these sayings are definitely untrue, some
of them are uninformed opinion, and some of them are controversies that
might or might not be true.
1. Chess is hard to learn
Chess may not be the easiest game to learn, but it is far from the most
difficult. You have to learn the moves of the six pieces, where the piece
with the least value, the Pawn, has the most complicated moves. Then you
have to learn the rules about attacking and defending the King, including
castling. Then there are a few rules about games where neither player
wins.
• One aspect of this myth is true -- it is hard, very hard, to learn to play
chess well. One player in a hundred achieves mastery.
2. Chess is thousands of years old
We can reliably date the direct ancestors of chess to around 600 A.D. This
makes the game 1400 years old. If chess survives another 100 years we
can then round up to 2000 years old, making the game 'thousands of
years old'.
• We can reliably date chess as we know it, where Queens and Bishops
move like the modern pieces, to the end of the 15th century, around the
the time that Christoph Columbus discovered America. This makes the
modern game a little more than 500 years old.
3. Chess is a waste of time
This is better classified as an opinion than as a myth. Of course, chess is
'only a game'. Unlike many games, it also incorporates elements of logic
and art. If these are wastes of time, then so is chess.
• For many people in our modern world, anything not related to economic
development is a waste of time. For those people, chess is certainly a
waste of time. So be it. Let each person choose his or her pleasures in life.
4. You have to be smart to play chess
There is some relationship between chess ability and general intelligence.
Minimum smarts are required. Cats and dogs will never learn the basics;
no one has tried teaching dolphins and chimpanzees. Chess does involve,
after all, using various advanced compartments of the brain as efficiently
as possible.
• People from all walks of life enjoy playing chess, many attaining mastery.
Some very smart people enjoy playing but never go beyond beginner.
5. Chess is for nerds
In fact, this isn't a myth, since chess is for everyone. It is for nerds, geeks,
eggheads, and boffins, as much as it is for anyone else. People who need
to call other people unpleasant names should better say, 'chess is only for
nerds', but this is decidedly false. Even if it were true, so what? Smart,
awkward, quirky people have made more contributions to the advancement
of humanity than have the rest. If they want to play chess, that's their
business.
6. Chess has been solved by computers
Computers have made impressive strides chipping away at the front and
back ends of chess. Opening theory extends beyond 10-15 moves in some
popular openings, endgames of up to five pieces (counting the two Kings)
have been perfectly solved by gigantic databases, and endgames of six
pieces are also yielding their secrets. In contrast, computers have made
little progress tackling the intractable complexities that lie between the
opening and the endgame. Chess is not a simple game.
7. Computers play chess better than humans
In 2006, the best computers play chess better than 99.99% of humans, but
are evenly matched in games against the best humans. If, as some experts
consider, computers are gaining 20 - 30 rating points per year, the time will
soon come when humans have no chance against the best machines.
• It should not be overlooked that computers are always trained by
teams of human specialists who program them in psychological areas like
opening repertoire. Removing this advantage would erase their superiority.
8. Chess is a sport
Here we run the risk of upsetting the many outstanding chess organizers
who have spent years trying to convince the International Olympic
Committee (IOC) that chess should be included as an Olympic sport. Lifting
little pieces of wood or clicking quickly on a computer screen is not
physically demanding activity. As any number of photos from recent high
level chess events will show, chess players don't always cut a slim, trim,
athletic profile.
9. Chess isn't a sport
Here we try to make amends with those same organizers who almost
convinced the IOC that chess is a sport. Chess has been included as a
medal sport for the 2006 Asian Games.
• A game between two top chess masters is full of tension, where good
nerves can make the difference between a winner and an also - ran.
Grandmasters have been known to lose a lot of weight during the course
of a month-long match.
10. Women can't play chess as well as men
To date it is true that women have not performed as well as men in chess
events. There are many possible reasons for this. One may be that male
players are often expert at making female players feel uncomfortable at
chess events. The Polgar sisters have gone a long way to convince the
chess world that women can play very well. Perhaps one day we will
discover that women can even play better than men. No one really knows.
By: Mark Weeks
People, especially chess players themselves, say the darnedest things
about chess and about chess players. Here are some of our favorite myths
about the royal game. Some of these sayings are definitely untrue, some
of them are uninformed opinion, and some of them are controversies that
might or might not be true.
1. Chess is hard to learn
Chess may not be the easiest game to learn, but it is far from the most
difficult. You have to learn the moves of the six pieces, where the piece
with the least value, the Pawn, has the most complicated moves. Then you
have to learn the rules about attacking and defending the King, including
castling. Then there are a few rules about games where neither player
wins.
• One aspect of this myth is true -- it is hard, very hard, to learn to play
chess well. One player in a hundred achieves mastery.
2. Chess is thousands of years old
We can reliably date the direct ancestors of chess to around 600 A.D. This
makes the game 1400 years old. If chess survives another 100 years we
can then round up to 2000 years old, making the game 'thousands of
years old'.
• We can reliably date chess as we know it, where Queens and Bishops
move like the modern pieces, to the end of the 15th century, around the
the time that Christoph Columbus discovered America. This makes the
modern game a little more than 500 years old.
3. Chess is a waste of time
This is better classified as an opinion than as a myth. Of course, chess is
'only a game'. Unlike many games, it also incorporates elements of logic
and art. If these are wastes of time, then so is chess.
• For many people in our modern world, anything not related to economic
development is a waste of time. For those people, chess is certainly a
waste of time. So be it. Let each person choose his or her pleasures in life.
4. You have to be smart to play chess
There is some relationship between chess ability and general intelligence.
Minimum smarts are required. Cats and dogs will never learn the basics;
no one has tried teaching dolphins and chimpanzees. Chess does involve,
after all, using various advanced compartments of the brain as efficiently
as possible.
• People from all walks of life enjoy playing chess, many attaining mastery.
Some very smart people enjoy playing but never go beyond beginner.
5. Chess is for nerds
In fact, this isn't a myth, since chess is for everyone. It is for nerds, geeks,
eggheads, and boffins, as much as it is for anyone else. People who need
to call other people unpleasant names should better say, 'chess is only for
nerds', but this is decidedly false. Even if it were true, so what? Smart,
awkward, quirky people have made more contributions to the advancement
of humanity than have the rest. If they want to play chess, that's their
business.
6. Chess has been solved by computers
Computers have made impressive strides chipping away at the front and
back ends of chess. Opening theory extends beyond 10-15 moves in some
popular openings, endgames of up to five pieces (counting the two Kings)
have been perfectly solved by gigantic databases, and endgames of six
pieces are also yielding their secrets. In contrast, computers have made
little progress tackling the intractable complexities that lie between the
opening and the endgame. Chess is not a simple game.
7. Computers play chess better than humans
In 2006, the best computers play chess better than 99.99% of humans, but
are evenly matched in games against the best humans. If, as some experts
consider, computers are gaining 20 - 30 rating points per year, the time will
soon come when humans have no chance against the best machines.
• It should not be overlooked that computers are always trained by
teams of human specialists who program them in psychological areas like
opening repertoire. Removing this advantage would erase their superiority.
8. Chess is a sport
Here we run the risk of upsetting the many outstanding chess organizers
who have spent years trying to convince the International Olympic
Committee (IOC) that chess should be included as an Olympic sport. Lifting
little pieces of wood or clicking quickly on a computer screen is not
physically demanding activity. As any number of photos from recent high
level chess events will show, chess players don't always cut a slim, trim,
athletic profile.
9. Chess isn't a sport
Here we try to make amends with those same organizers who almost
convinced the IOC that chess is a sport. Chess has been included as a
medal sport for the 2006 Asian Games.
• A game between two top chess masters is full of tension, where good
nerves can make the difference between a winner and an also - ran.
Grandmasters have been known to lose a lot of weight during the course
of a month-long match.
10. Women can't play chess as well as men
To date it is true that women have not performed as well as men in chess
events. There are many possible reasons for this. One may be that male
players are often expert at making female players feel uncomfortable at
chess events. The Polgar sisters have gone a long way to convince the
chess world that women can play very well. Perhaps one day we will
discover that women can even play better than men. No one really knows.
| "Bringing Chess Instruction to as many Children as Possible" |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
PAGES
